Consentus

Clan Forum => Debates => Debates archive => Topic started by: I Eat Sub on July 11, 2020, 07:19:38

Title: Golden State killer
Post by: I Eat Sub on July 11, 2020, 07:19:38

Do you think   golden state Killer should of got  the death penalty or do believe he should live in jail?

 https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/29/us/golden-state-killer-plea-expected/index.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_State_Killer

Title: Re: Golden State killer
Post by: Joe on July 11, 2020, 16:58:11

I've never been a big backer of the death penalty.  To me it has always seemed "too easy" for those who are sentenced.  Making them live with their consequences has always felt like more of a punishment in my view. 

Title: Re: Golden State killer
Post by: Danny on July 11, 2020, 21:05:32

I share the exact same views as Joe. The death penalty is the easy way out, spending the rest of your life cages up like the demented animal that you are is a more fitting punishment.

This was an interesting read, especially how they caught him. They used genetic genealogy and caught him because the DNA from one of his crime scenes matched up with one of his relatives that was registered on a genealogy site.

Title: Re: Golden State killer
Post by: Only Lilly on July 12, 2020, 13:50:40

DNA is something very positive to come out of Leicester that iks for sure.

I do agree with the dath penalty in some case and this is one.  Yes he would have to think of his craimes every day, who is to say he wouldnt enjoy  reliving his past rapes and murders. 

Defiantly death in my eyes.