Consentus

Clan Forum => Debates => Debates archive => Topic started by: Noxarion on September 22, 2014, 20:24:19

Title: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [Week 2]
Post by: Noxarion on September 22, 2014, 20:24:19
Are girls sexual objects, that's what we are going to discuss because I find this one of the most disturbing 'problems' of this century. Before we go into the discussion we first need to look at what Sexual objectification, as it's called,  actualy means. The meaning of Sexual objectification is: 'The act of treating a person merely as an instrument of sexual pleasure.' What means treating someone as a sex object.
Yes I know you can also put the title the other way around asking are boys sex objects, but the statisticks don't lie and show that girls are far more considered sex objects than boys.
With music videos getting more and more about sexy girls in as little clothing as possible instead of actualy having good music (mostly modern pop and rap music). And with social media and even video games making this even worse. Why video games ? Well in most games (RPG's mostly) the females look like whores who compared to their male counterparts wearing the same armour but mosly just covering the private parts. This fact alone makes that atleast 40% of all female characters on big games like World of Warcraft, Elderscrolls Online and Guild Wars 2 are males. And with the september month having the biggest nude pictures of celeberties hack (or as most know it as The fappening 1 and The fappening 2) doesn't really help the case. On runescape this isn't really the case cause the female character models on runescape aren't really that great.
A year ago or so I watched a documentary about how the 2 genders see eachother and some of the statisticks they showed were just scary (No I dont know the name of the documentary) I bring this in cause this was based on the people of England. With around 90% of the boys between age 13-18 seeying girls as nothing more than sex objects and this is disturbing. No suprise that this lead to a rise in sexual abuse (or rape as it's simply called) in the west of europe and the USA.
Here in the netherlands we don't wear special school uniforms but since a year or 2 some schools have set rules for clothing. I remember when I was in midschool as we call it, it wasn't that bad you would have girls wear short clothing during summer and warm days but only sometimes a girl with 'slutty' clothing would be seen. Now 4 years after I went from midschool that has changed dramaticly.

So, how do we reduce this 90% and how do we teach the children of these days how to treat eachother ? That is what this week's discussion is about..

Week 1: http://consentus.co.uk/debates/weekly-discussions-this-isn't-going-to-be-for-the-softies-(week-1) (http://consentus.co.uk/debates/weekly-discussions-this-isn't-going-to-be-for-the-softies-(week-1))
Week 3: http://consentus.co.uk/debates/weekly-discussions-league-of-fucking-rage-(week-3) (http://consentus.co.uk/debates/weekly-discussions-league-of-fucking-rage-(week-3))
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Redtunnel on September 22, 2014, 21:29:09
(click to show/hide)

While it is offensive, I think it serves as an illustration on how misogynistic men rationalize their views, and herein lies the solution. We need to break free from cemented gender norms and teach boys at an early age that women, and girls for that matter, can be idolized for more than their beauty.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Mike on September 22, 2014, 22:12:33
Yes.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Minin Cape T on September 22, 2014, 22:14:54
(click to show/hide)

While it is offensive, I think it serves as an illustration on how misogynistic men rationalize their views, and herein lies the solution. We need to break free from cemented gender norms and teach boys at an early age that women, and girls for that matter, can be idolized for more than their beauty.
WORD!
We are all from the same beginnings. Everyone is human and everyone should be treated the same. Humans are the most incredible creatures on earth but we judge so much off of gender, skin color, sexuality, etc and not off character or anything.
The media doesn't really help this kind of stuff which is unfortunate. But sadly people are shallow
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Noxarion on September 23, 2014, 00:25:10
I agree, that we should start learning boys that girls are more than just good looks.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Matty on September 23, 2014, 02:22:53
Yes.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Greg on September 23, 2014, 02:35:43
It is the trend of many girls dressing as whores at an early age is why, in my opinion, are viewed as sex objects by similar aged lads. I drove past my old highschools and I swear, I had to keep my eyes at head level as they were going around in leggings or mini skirts.

The minds of the current generation are exploited at a young age.

South Park Bebe's Boobs destroy society. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcQvX1AeJu4#ws)

Oh, I also blame porn and alcohol.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Joel on September 23, 2014, 14:05:12
I don't see women like that at all really, of course with the lads you all have the 'she's nice' conversation but I don't see it solely as that.. What worries me is younger girls dressing 'slutty' or older then they should be. In my opinion it only encourges pedophelia and kidnapping and such.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Only Lilly on September 23, 2014, 20:37:59
I think that some women need to respect themselves as well.  Too many women use their sexuality to get their own way and trap men.

In my opinion if a woman wants to take her clothes off, sleep with a man or perform some sex act for vast amounts of money then why not?  If that's how they choose to earn a living then so be it.  As long it is their choice and not another persons.  I am sure that some of these women earn more in a week than I do in a year. 
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Noxarion on September 23, 2014, 21:40:05
I agree with your point lilly, since prostitution is legal in alot of countries it's not that big of a problem but not every girl that dresses 'sexy' is a prostitute and wants to sleep with someone and thats one of the major issues.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Amy on September 23, 2014, 22:00:18
Men are sexual beings by nature and films, music videos and games just encourage that. Sexual objectification of woman is subjected everywhere we look, sex sells unfortunately and if anything we, as a society are just brainwashed into thinking 'this is how woman are and should be'. It's such a shame in my opinion that this is portrayed so much. There is a dear amount more to life than sex. The world is a deep place  to be explored, history to be made, and if others wish to fall into the trap of this shallow brainwashing than I feel sorry for them.

 ???
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Andrew on September 23, 2014, 22:35:06
Thing is we all have sexual desires and drives, there is no way someone can deny it and if you do you can fuck yourself.  Knowing this, and that society evolved with men being the dominant sex until recently, it is more socially acceptable for a man to have sexual motivations and desires than a female, in my opinion.  Until recently, women did not have the same rights as men and were more conservative and now with more rights and protection they express themselves more and it is now seen a lot more in public.  I do feel that there is a norm that girls are sex objects, and I believe the onus falls on females.  When females dress the way they do, act the way they do, talk the way they do it allows men to sexually objectify women.  I agree with Lilly (for once), that the responsibility needs to come from females and in doing so I think men will stop sexually objectifying them.

Saw this earlier and think it may be relevant. Will not post the pictures b/c apparently one of them is a minor and child pornography.

My friend sent me 3 pictures, one was of a girl and a guy hugging, normal.  On some drake type of shit, it went 0 to 100 real fucking quick.  Next picture, same girl and same guy plus some friends.  Normal right, no.  She was performing fellatio on this gentleman and the friends were all watching and someone snapped a pic #letmetakeablowjobpic.  3rd pic, cant get worse right? Nay, Nay.  Instagram pic of said girl with male bodily fluids in her oral cavity (guess she doesnt swallow heh), and caption saying "its milk guys, i promise"  SMFH.  So out of curiousity i google her name and come upon her Twitter.  Expecting to find tweets like, "my life is over" "omg cant believe i did it", i see tweets saying how she is a legend and all around praise.  If this doesn't contribute to the views of women as sex objects i dont know what does.

Twitter link cus shes a whore https://twitter.com/AllyLyons1

oh yh forgot she got suspended from school
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Noxarion on September 23, 2014, 22:46:14
So this is a problem that has to do with both genders en reading andrew's post and memories of something happened on midschool about a girl that posted a video of her touching herself it seems that this behaviour starts sooner and sooners so how do you fix this problem, or is this a problem that cant be fixed ?
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Minin Cape T on September 23, 2014, 23:02:32
Ya I saw those a few days ago Andrew.

It's hard to respect someone when they don't even respect themselves. It's all for attention which is even worse
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: I Eat Sub on September 24, 2014, 05:50:52
I think that some women need to respect themselves as well.  Too many women use their sexuality to get their own way and trap men.

Yep, I dont know if it happens to other men in this clan  but personally to me girls try to use me as a means of money . Even going as far as even lieing to string me along and thats a funny thing cause  they make it obvious that they lied. So you like me but you dont want to be in a relationship because it to soon to jump back into one but yet you  will flirt with a guy right in front of me .Preety slutty imo.

Your partner should be your not just be your husband or wife it should be your best friend aswell. He or  she should be around no matter what even if things are going bad. When you fail they fail when you succeed they succeed
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: maraderkholm on September 24, 2014, 06:53:59
http://www.motherjones.com/mixed-media/2014/09/watch-john-oliver-explain-just-how-mind-boggling-ridiculous-beauty-pageants-are (http://www.motherjones.com/mixed-media/2014/09/watch-john-oliver-explain-just-how-mind-boggling-ridiculous-beauty-pageants-are) - I think women should be able to wear whatever we want to without it being an ok to objectionable behavior.  It is each of our responsibility to control our behavior regardless of outside influences.  Women should be able to breastfeed in public.  Women should not constantly have to worry how the way we walk, talk, or dress is seen.  There is a girl missing in the U.S.  right now and more talk is on how she decided to walk a short distance home alone, what she was wearing, what her behavior was instead of the fact that she is missing and whoever knows what happened is at fault - not the poor girl.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: maraderkholm on September 24, 2014, 06:58:35
I think that some women need to respect themselves as well.  Too many women use their sexuality to get their own way and trap men.

In my opinion if a woman wants to take her clothes off, sleep with a man or perform some sex act for vast amounts of money then why not?  If that's how they choose to earn a living then so be it.  As long it is their choice and not another persons.  I am sure that some of these women earn more in a week than I do in a year. 

I worked in a battered women's shelter and I counsel high school students a lot.  I think you have some who make choices and some who don't see choices.  I think you are right that self respect is key for men and women - but we also have to respect others.  A lot of that comes from education and having a supportive family of some sort.  And then people should be free to make good and bad choices.  When you objectify someone - you are literally taking away their humanity.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: maraderkholm on September 24, 2014, 07:25:59
http://corvell.tumblr.com/post/98230036098/yesallwomen-because-my-cousin-shared-3-rape (http://corvell.tumblr.com/post/98230036098/yesallwomen-because-my-cousin-shared-3-rape) = good poem #yesallwomen
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Noxarion on September 24, 2014, 20:22:21
Hmm  I agree that if a girl wears 'sexy' clothing it doesn't mean that she wants to have sex with someone, but that's a part of the problem that in the mindset of people sexy clothing means you're a whore.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Trey on September 24, 2014, 21:43:16
Yes.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Redtunnel on September 24, 2014, 22:05:22
I'd be wary about legitimizing the argument about promiscuous clothing, because essentially it is only a conservative norm imposed by our culture, and I think it's something that we need to trascend. Think about it. If you see a naked girl playing at the beach, it's completely normal in our society (assuming she's fairly young), but if she's suddenly wearing a short skirt or whatever, she's inviting sexual thoughts? Not among most guys, I wager, but society tries to project that idea onto us (it would be very frowned upon to let the girl dress like that). These are the same type of norms that follow us through life. An example that isn't age specific is wearing a bikini at the beach, which is fine, but wearing it in the city? Not so much. Even replacing the bikini with regular underwear is a big no-no. Clothes don't objectify girls, ideas do.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: maraderkholm on September 24, 2014, 22:16:40
I agree 100% - a lot of the high school girls I know are not dressing to impress boys.  A lot of times they are trying to find themselves and are expressing what they like.  One of the smartest, sweetest girls I know wears crazy hair, clothing, and jewelry but she is very artistic and I think she is dressing for herself - I don't think other people should be judging her just based on what she wears.  Most people are shocked when they find out how bright and thoughtful she is.  To be fair, I have known her since preschool (she was in my oldest son's class) but it amazes me how nasty people can be when she is just a differently dressed person.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Minin Cape T on September 24, 2014, 22:19:23
I'd be wary about legitimizing the argument about promiscuous clothing, because essentially it is only a conservative norm imposed by our culture, and I think it's something that we need to trascend. Think about it, if you see a naked girl playing on the beach, it's completely normal in our society (assuming she's fairly young), but if she's suddenly wearing a short skirt or whatever, she's inviting sexual thoughts? Not among most guys, I wager, but society tries to project that idea onto us (it would be very frowned upon to let the girl dress like that). These are the same type of norms that follow us through life. An example that isn't age specific is wearing a bikini at the beach, which is fine, but wearing it in the city? Not so much. Even replacing the bikini with regular underwear is a big no-no. Clothes don't objectify girls, ideas do.
So true.
There's an organization in USA called GoTopless that encourages peaceful protests by not wearing shirts (ya no shit...) bc it's taboo for girls to walk around topless but not against the law. Where I live in new jersey no one can walk around shirtless, regardless of gender but in nyc they have rallies and stuff weekly it seems.
It's pretty cool
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Minin Cape T on September 24, 2014, 22:25:59
I agree 100% - a lot of the high school girls I know are not dressing to impress boys.  A lot of times they are trying to find themselves and are expressing what they like.  One of the smartest, sweetest girls I know wears crazy hair, clothing, and jewelry but she is very artistic and I think she is dressing for herself - I don't think other people should be judging her just based on what she wears.  Most people are shocked when they find out how bright and thoughtful she is.  To be fair, I have known her since preschool (she was in my oldest son's class) but it amazes me how nasty people can be when she is just a differently dressed person.
It's easy to judge people off what they look like.  Especially if they don't want to take the time to get to know the person bc their peers would think less of them. It's harsh but true
And ofc expressing yourself in a positive way is a good thing. Everyone will realize that eventually.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Noxarion on September 25, 2014, 00:27:06
Indeed, first impressions count really heavy for humans if we say it doesn't. I think the most important thing we should learn the children is that clothes don't say alot, the only reason that humans started to wear clothes is for protection in the modern society that changed.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Emma on September 25, 2014, 09:59:18
I'd be wary about legitimizing the argument about promiscuous clothing, because essentially it is only a conservative norm imposed by our culture, and I think it's something that we need to trascend. Think about it. If you see a naked girl playing at the beach, it's completely normal in our society (assuming she's fairly young), but if she's suddenly wearing a short skirt or whatever, she's inviting sexual thoughts? Not among most guys, I wager, but society tries to project that idea onto us (it would be very frowned upon to let the girl dress like that). These are the same type of norms that follow us through life. An example that isn't age specific is wearing a bikini at the beach, which is fine, but wearing it in the city? Not so much. Even replacing the bikini with regular underwear is a big no-no. Clothes don't objectify girls, ideas do.

I love you sometimes Red. I hope you know that.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Josh on September 25, 2014, 10:53:47
I'd be wary about legitimizing the argument about promiscuous clothing, because essentially it is only a conservative norm imposed by our culture, and I think it's something that we need to trascend. Think about it. If you see a naked girl playing at the beach, it's completely normal in our society (assuming she's fairly young), but if she's suddenly wearing a short skirt or whatever, she's inviting sexual thoughts? Not among most guys, I wager, but society tries to project that idea onto us (it would be very frowned upon to let the girl dress like that). These are the same type of norms that follow us through life. An example that isn't age specific is wearing a bikini at the beach, which is fine, but wearing it in the city? Not so much. Even replacing the bikini with regular underwear is a big no-no. Clothes don't objectify girls, ideas do.

This just sums it up for me. No they are not sex objects BUT say for instance either of you decide not to have a relationship (romantic anyway) then you technically would be using each other as sex objects? And this is fine but it's when its agreed mutually.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Noxarion on September 25, 2014, 12:17:37
When you agree on a "friends with benefits" type relation than it's basicly not a problem cause you both agreed with it, and I agree with red that the modern idea's causes this problem.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Alan on September 25, 2014, 18:37:25
While I agree that the sexualisation of women everywhere I look is disgusting, you can easily say the same for men. Look at all the cologne or hollister or whatever it is ads. When do you see anyone but someone who's got a six-pack and a great jaw line etc. in those?

Now this is not to say that male sexualisation is on the same level as female, because it is no where near the same level but making it out to be a female-only problem is definitely not the case.

Having said that, I think you have to blame the media. There's so much hype around how women dress, how smooth their skin is and their "perfect" make-up, it's hard not to be pressured into seeing women as nothing but sex objects. I mean I can't say I haven't had conversations with friends about girls "examining" women like nothing more then an object and I know it's wrong, but on the same note, I wouldn't take any of them seriously about it. To give you an example, last year we had a non-uniform say in school where we were allowed to come to school dressed in whatever clothes we want, out of the 106 girls in my yeargroup, only 3 didn't have leggings or a short-skirt barely covering the top half of their thighs and low-cut tops to show off their clevege. How can those women claim that men view them as nothing more then sex objects when they dress like that? They could have come in dressed in tracksuits or jeans, instead they chose clothes that objectify them and degrade them to nothing more then sex objects.

To conclude, I do not condone the viewing of women as sex objects, but at the same time, women should not blame us males solely and  quite frankly, dress appropriately.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Minin Cape T on September 25, 2014, 19:04:03
While I agree that the sexualisation of women everywhere I look is disgusting, you can easily say the same for men. Look at all the cologne or hollister or whatever it is ads. When do you see anyone but someone who's got a six-pack and a great jaw line etc. in those?

Now this is not to say that male sexualisation is on the same level as female, because it is no where near the same level but making it out to be a female-only problem is definitely not the case.

Having said that, I think you have to blame the media. There's so much hype around how women dress, how smooth their skin is and their "perfect" make-up, it's hard not to be pressured into seeing women as nothing but sex objects. I mean I can't say I haven't had conversations with friends about girls "examining" women like nothing more then an object and I know it's wrong, but on the same note, I wouldn't take any of them seriously about it. To give you an example, last year we had a non-uniform say in school where we were allowed to come to school dressed in whatever clothes we want, out of the 106 girls in my yeargroup, only 3 didn't have leggings or a short-skirt barely covering the top half of their thighs and low-cut tops to show off their clevege. How can those women claim that men view them as nothing more then sex objects when they dress like that? They could have come in dressed in tracksuits or jeans, instead they chose clothes that objectify them and degrade them to nothing more then sex objects.

To conclude, I do not condone the viewing of women as sex objects, but at the same time, women should not blame us males solely and  quite frankly, dress appropriately.
but what is appropriate? Everyone is allowed to express themselves in a peaceful way and clothing has been a way of expression since forever.
Wearing/not wearing clothes isn't the source of the problem. It's our thoughts/fellings.

If you introduced someone wearing revealing clothing and someone wearing not revealing clothing to an alien or whatever. Someone with no exposure to our culture, they wouldn't think of either as a sexual object.

The only reason humans think like that is because  we were raised in a society that thinks like that.
Title: Re: Weekly Discussions - Are girls sex objects ? [week 2]
Post by: Noxarion on September 26, 2014, 16:04:59
I agree that everyone can wear what he/she wants if it fits within the norms ofcourse. I think the main problem is the mindset of some people towards 'sexy/short' clothing. I do think there are some too short or too sexy clothing for school/work so I can understand why these places have their own rules for clothing. So I think a good start to fix this 'wrong mindset' is teaching children that 'sexy/short' clothing doesnt mean anything.